Matthew Januszek, co-founder of Escape Fitness and partner in Escape Fitness USA, and Mo Iqbal, Founder and CEO of SweatWorks, bring in Jon Canarick — Managing Partner at North Castle Partners — to examine one of the most closely watched stories in boutique fitness: the changes at Xponential Fitness following the departure of Anthony Geisler.

This special LIFTS episode moves quickly from the specific Xponential situation into the structural issues it exposes — the data franchisees lack before committing to a location, the wide variability in boutique studio build costs, and the lessons available from rapid-expansion stories like Xponential and F45.

What This Episode Covers

Jon Canarick leads at North Castle Partners, a private equity firm focused on the healthy, active, and sustainable living sectors. That positioning gives Canarick and his team a broad view across fitness brands at different stages of growth, from early-stage concepts through mature franchise systems.

His perspective on Xponential is informed not just by the headlines but by the mechanics of how fitness franchise deals are structured, what information prospective franchisees actually receive before signing, and where the incentives between franchisor and franchisee tend to diverge as a system scales rapidly.

On LIFTS, Canarick draws on that experience to offer a grounded assessment of what Anthony Geisler's departure means for Xponential's acquisition pipeline and its ability to sell new franchises, while also looking ahead at the broader opportunities he sees for fitness brands willing to operate with more transparency and better data.

Key Moments from the Conversation

• Anthony Geisler's departure from Xponential creates uncertainty around brand acquisition momentum and the ability to maintain the pace of new franchise sales that the company built its growth model around.
• A persistent gap in the franchising world is the lack of sufficient proof points and location-specific performance data provided to prospective franchisees before large-scale sales begin, leaving buyers to make major financial commitments with incomplete information.
• Boutique fitness studio build costs and revenue potential vary significantly by market and format, making location-level diligence far more important than industry averages suggest.
• The rapid expansion strategies pursued by Xponential and F45 offer useful case studies — both in what aggressive franchise growth can achieve and in the fragility it can create when market conditions shift.
• Regulations governing franchise disclosure are a factor in how much protection prospective franchisees actually receive, and there is a gap between what is legally required and what would genuinely support informed decision-making.
• The fitness industry still has meaningful opportunities for brands that approach growth with stronger unit economics, better data sharing, and a clearer value proposition for franchisees.
• The news around Xponential is likely to influence how other fitness brands approach expansion strategy, potentially slowing the pace of franchise sales across the boutique sector in the near term.

Why This Conversation Matters

Matthew Januszek has spent years thinking about how fitness brands scale — from Escape Fitness's growth as an equipment business to his work with Escape Fitness USA. The questions Jon Canarick raises on LIFTS about franchise data, unit economics, and founder-dependent growth are directly relevant to how any fitness brand thinks about sustainable expansion.

For LIFTS listeners who are operators, investors, or founders in the fitness space, this episode offers a private equity perspective on the structural forces behind one of the sector's biggest stories — a grounding in the business mechanics that often get lost in the news cycle.

▶  Watch the full episode on YouTube

Related Episodes & Interviews

• John Ford →
• Bruce Smith →
• HFA Vegas 2025 →